Saturday, October 6, 2012

Not "Just" a Teacher...

I've spent my free time recently preparing remarks in response to recognition as an Inspiring Educator by my alma mater Shenandoah University.

So, I'll cheat a little here and just post those remarks.  Warning: it's lengthy.  Also, I cribbed some from earlier posts.  My remarks are directed toward other teachers and, I hope, inspire others to take action.

For those who prefer not to read: Not "Just a Teacher"



Not “Just a Teacher” but the Hope for America’s Future.

         When you’ve been asked what you do for a living have you ever replied, “Oh, I’m just a teacher…”  Or maybe you have heard others consider what they might want to do with their lives, and they throw teaching into consideration.  As in: “I think I will teach.  Then that will give me time in the afternoons to….(fill in the blank)  write my novel, pursue my acting career, take classes for my real career.” 
         Those of us in the teaching field who have spent a lifetime working to create a better future for the following generation are at a distinct disadvantage. Teaching is probably the only career where nearly every person in the nation has watched the work on a daily basis.  We have all been taught, so naturally we feel that we can do the job easily enough.  It certainly looks easy from a desk in the room.
         Of course those of us who have been in the field for a while know the full scope of the job and snicker at the “I’ll use my afternoons to pursue another career” commentary.   We wait with our arms folded to see how that plan works out.
         If I were to get my wish I would expunge the phrase “just a teacher” from all conversations, and would especially insist that teachers themselves never let these words pass their lips.  No coffee cup of mine (or anyone else’s for that matter) would ever read: “Those who can, do.  Those who cannot, teach.”  Because teachers in this nation do, and do, and do, and do for nearly every child of every parent in the country.
         But just what is it that teachers do?
         In 2010 and 11 I was privileged to serve on the National Education Association Commission on Effective Teachers and Teaching.  Our charge was to envision a teaching profession, led by the teachers themselves.  For me, this was an opportunity to realize a lifelong dream: to see teaching established as a true profession.  One of the other commissioners on the team was Mary Hatwood Futrell.  You may not remember her, but I do.  She was the NEA president in 1983 when "A Nation at Risk" was released.  At the NEA convention Futrell called for the same thing that was recommended in the 1983 report: a Teaching Profession.  I watched her speak on television.  I wanted that then.  I think we are long overdue for it now.  To serve with her has been a chief satisfaction of my career.
         In our work on the commission we were frequently reminded that the definition of a profession is that it claims a clear, rigorous, universally accepted body of knowledge and skills.   So the question of what is it teachers know and are able to do was central to our work.
         Though the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards had, I felt, already defined much of this work, we set out to examine the entire continuum of a teaching career from pre-service through a career ladder that would ensure that teachers who grow and excel in their career might continue to enjoy challenges, growth, and financial reward without leaving the classroom.  Keeping talented teachers in front of students should be a chief goal of any educational system.     
We defined the following knowledge as necessary for success in today’s and the future’s classrooms:

  •    *  Knowledge of the content matter.
  •      8Child, adolescent, and abnormal psychology
  •       *English language development and second language acquisition strategies
  •       *Instructional methods, strategies, and practices
  • ·      Curriculum models and practices
  • ·      Instructional technology practices and information technology use
  • ·      Standards-based curriculum design
  • ·      Content-based reading and writing strategies
  • ·      Instructional adaptations to address students’ individual learning styles, readiness to learn, and level of independence
  • ·      Instructional accommodations for students’ special learning needs
  • ·      Impact of socioeconomic background, ethnicity, race, gender, language skills, disability, and other factors on teaching and learning
  • ·      And classroom management strategies
And that is just the knowledge that every teacher today needs in order to serve our diverse population.  In addition to those, teachers need to learn how to do the following:

  • ·      Plan instruction
  • ·      Guide students through a variety of learning experiences
  • ·      Assess student progress
  • ·      Analyze student learning out comes
  • ·      Diagnose special needs, prescribe learning strategies, develop remedial plans, and adjust instruction to suit special needs
  • ·      Reflect on practice
  • ·      Collaborate with colleagues
  • Incorporate 21st century skills, such as critical thinking and problem solving, into teacher practice.
It turns out that teaching is rocket science.
 
         Though that is the knowledge we identified, the best teachers have so much more. And the disposition to teach is much less easy to quantify, but I will make a stab at it.
         Since most teachers are women, their supposed frailty as the weaker sex often leads to an outsider's view of teachers as clueless, sheltered idealists, out of touch with the world.
         Nothing of the sort.
         A career teacher has seen every permutation of human behavior and dealt with it at eye-level: students who have been abused, students who abuse others or drugs, incidents of criminal behavior, mental illness, extreme poverty and homelessness, sexual aggression, bullying, breakdowns, violence, along with smaller matters like broken hearts, illness (think everything from vomit and bloody noses to a shocking death), fire drills, bomb threats, lockdowns, extreme weather, car accidents—the whole panorama of human conflict. 
         Teachers cannot afford to be cowed. 
         No flinching allowed.
         They plow in to find the source of a problem and then model the strength and skills to move students beyond those realities to imagine a different life.  
         Just part of the job.
         It is a balancing act that excellent teachers can make look very easy.
         It isn’t. 
         Not everyone can do it.
         It means hearing about student struggle without blinking. Or running away.
         It means acknowledging situations with compassion while exhibiting confidence.  Kids need to see adults who can handle “whatever” without wigging out.
         And then teachers will insist on and assist kids to cope and continue learning.
         Teachers who fail make mistakes of two kinds: coddling hard-luck kids and expecting less than their best, or going overboard by ignoring hindrances and focusing solely on curriculum.  
         One instructional text puts it this way:  Some teach kids.  Some teach their subject.  The best teach their subject to kids.
         And then there is a sense of humor.  That is a must.
         We laugh in the face of puke or public breakdowns – both extremes every teacher faces in the classroom at one time or another.
         We feel the emotional tenor of a building as it ripples through the school year, and shrug off both up and down days to face the next day with the same equanimity as the previous day.
         It is a tightrope walk teachers – primarily women – enact in full view on a daily basis.
         Good teachers know more about the realities of their community than their sheltered friends in business.
         Good teachers are about as real as they come.
         Good teachers are smart, and flexible, and ruffle-proof.
         Good teachers are tough – and warm – and funny. 

         So please don’t tell anyone that you are “just” a teacher.  In fact, if I am an inspiring teacher, I would wish that I could inspire you to stand squarely and claim the revered title of Teacher with a capital “T”.   But I wouldn’t stop there.
         As a member of a profession whose sole objective is to advocate for children, I would ask you to go further by speaking out about the current state of education and the past decade of so-called reforms.
         In 1983, my hero/mentor/role-model Mary Futrell told People magazine: "If we sit back and do nothing, they will push us around.  Teachers are no longer going to be the passive little old ladies who accept what's handed to them."

         Well, I feel that in the current era of reform they have been pushing us around.  In the void created by the failure to establish a true teaching profession—a  hallmark, by the way, of the nations who score at the top of the often reported international PISA exams—policymakers have entered our arena and defined our work for us, often based on assumptions that are neither valid nor true for what it takes to create a climate for effective teaching and learning.
         For instance, we now have standardized tests that teachers neither see, create or assist in scoring, creating the impression that teachers cannot be trusted to either assess or evaluate their own students.  This work has been taken away from the teaching force and added sometimes hobbling costs to localities.
         In an effort to improve scores, scripted lessons and stringent curriculum maps imposed wholesale by systems remove the possibility for individualized teacher decision-making in the immediacy of the classroom, where teachers can assess student’s abilities and understandings and can re-teach or re-group when children fall behind the approved schedule. Researchers who have observed and documented teachers involved in the real work of classrooms, estimate that a teacher makes approximately 1,320 discreet decisions in a day.  Scripts and timelines strip away the decision-making autonomy of a professional teacher.
         Other seemingly benign efforts to improve schools, like Teach for America or Career Switcher programs, place the emphasis on content knowledge and give scant training and attention to the other skills of an effective teacher.  Programs such as these imply that anyone can teach, a premise which puts children in the hands of novices who are often overwhelmed by their new careers.  Frequent turnover of instructors and instability in the neighborhood school is the result.
         Finally, the most recent reforms are teacher evaluations tied to student test scores which have at their core the assumption that one test on one day is an accurate measure of the time, effort and talent a teacher puts into instruction.  The other suspect premises are that all children proceed at the same rate and that it is a valuable use of resources and instructional time to submit students to relentless testing in order to evaluate the adults in the room.
         The debate has been going full throttle on every side of the aisle for ten years and all corners have been heard loud and clear except from the teachers themselves.  Those who have had sway in these new directives are now threatening the very fabric of a touchstone of our democracy, a free and public education for every child. 
         So what can we do?  First, know your students.  Know your work.  Continue to learn and grow.  Be proud of what you do each day for the children of our community.  And in the confidence borne of effective practice, demand that the work of teachers be recognized as a profession. 
         The outline for establishing a teaching profession exists in the document created by the members of the Commission on Effective Teachers and Teaching.  Secretary Arne Duncan has given the report his support through his R.E.S.P.E.C.T. program.  Seek out the report and the initiative and make sure it becomes a reality by insisting that teacher organizations you belong to join in the efforts to create a new profession.  We need to stand on our authority as the deliverers of instruction and speak in a single voice in defense of a joyful education as a necessary right for every child.  Every child should have access to a rich curriculum that includes music, art, and physical education.  Every child should be able to go to a neighborhood school and learn in safety beside their diverse neighbors.  Every child should have a well-trained, well-compensated teacher leading them in lessons that are appropriate for the child’s age and abilities.  Every child needs a well-lit, well-resourced classroom where the message “You are valued” is apparent in their surroundings.  Every child should have access to the joy that comes from learning and the opportunity to find and leverage their own potential.
         Please join me in working toward a true teaching profession, where the voice of those who know, love, understand, support, encourage, and challenge the children of America are heard with the respect due to those who have the knowledge, skills, and compassion to build the next generation every day in every classroom.
         And never say, “I’m just a teacher” again.


Saturday, September 15, 2012

What Chicago (and other) teachers fight for....

Though the Chicago's teacher's strike has tentatively come to an end, getting the issues fairly addressed in the media as been a struggle.  Here is what they are fighting for int he words of a Chicago teacher.  Please pass it on.

"...the mainstream media is not covering all of the issues for which the teachers are striking.  It is unsettling, but that is where we come in.  It is our job to talk with friends, colleagues, and neighbors to illuminate the struggles that the students face in Chicago.  A school with 1000 students does not have a social worker.  Teachers use economic text books that are 12 years old.  Our curriculum has become more and more narrowed to teach finite skills on absurdly written tests, tests which close our neighborhood schools and unfairly evaluate us.  In CPS once test scores drop, the district begins to divest in the school and take away parent, teacher, and administrative voice, leaving the schools left to improve with fewer resources..."

If we care about children, we can do better.  Detractors paint teachers as selfish money-grubbers who work few hours for high pay.  That is not the issue.

The issues are:

Do we really want to assess teachers based on student test scores?  Not only has this been repeatedly proven to be unreliable, it means that students will have to sit for tests--all the time.

Try to imagine being a student who must take multiple tests in every grade.  Now try to imagine how teachers and systems might try to ensure that all students are read to take the tests.  Right.  More tests to make sure they are ready for THE test.  (This is already the way many students experience school right now.)  Now, try to imagine how an adult, who's livelihood depends on the test scores, might behave.  Getting a little ugly, isn't it?

Who, in this fight, is really thinking about the children?

Why is there NO money for air-conditioning or new texts but there IS money for charter schools and multiple tests?  (Both of which have been proven to have very poor track records for improving education.)

Who, in this fight, is really thinking about children?

Why is poverty an EXCUSE for teachers but not for public officials?  Children make up the majority of those who live in poverty, but that's okay?

Who, in this fight, is thinking about children?

Monday, September 3, 2012

Feeding the Data Machine

In 1978 when I began teaching, I was handed a plan book, grade book, curriculum map, test book, and a schedule.

Off to work I went, writing things down, assessing kids all by myself, and reporting grades.  (To be honest, I can't remember how we did this!  Were high school report cards hand written?)

Today, all teachers must be conversant with a wide variety of software: grading software (that keeps parents continually updated), a student-accessible website (that must be continually updated), and a large variety of behind the scenes software responsible for collecting data (that ultimately must be kept 'fed' by the classroom teacher).  All of these duties take more time than the old-fashioned method.  (But if its in a computer then it must be true!)

Every school year, each program must be updated with the current rosters.  This year we are adding individual online student accounts to access the textbook - as I'm sure is occurring all over the nation as textbooks gain an online presence.

This takes considerable time and often results in a mad scramble at the beginning of the year as kids are put into the system, taken out, moved around, and on and on.  Yesterday, (Sunday of Labor Day) I spent five hours in service to some of these tools.  I will spend more time updating the course website later today.  (Computers: So convenient you can continue to work from home!)

Sometimes things go awry.  We are not a Fortune 500 corporation with legions of data crunchers and IT specialists.  In public schooling it is every district for itself when it comes to meeting the data-driven demands in terms of salaries and techy tools.  Each year these tools take up more and more of the budget pie.

But the data machine must be fed, and it is getting worse rather than better.  The reformist love affair with numbers means that nothing is real unless it is quantifiable with a number.

The classroom teacher provides all the raw data.

And so, just like the day I realized I was working for the machines in my life -- car, household appliances--rather than the other way around, I find myself increasingly chained to a computer. (Thoreau: We do not ride on the railroad.  It rides upon us.)

And it's not helping.

Recently, in an effort to get our struggling students some additional help as soon as possible, rather than waiting on the official data, we asked teachers to look at their previous year's rosters, highlight the names of kids who could benefit from some enriching activities, and send the lists on.

It took about ten minutes.

That's what can happen when you rely on professional judgement.

Still waiting on the "data."

Sometimes it feels like we're spinning our wheels.

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Shift the culture for lasting change

Those who follow this blog already know of my great respect for the model that is the National Writing Project. The work done through this network of educators has been frequently referred to as professional development that works in that it affects a lasting change in teacher practice over time.

This summer, in a short presentation on working with professionals across a generational divide (four generations, the largest cross-generational grouping, now work side by side) I was exposed to the simple graphic below as an explanation for why certain generational groups approach their work differently.

It immediately resonated as a model for the failure of most of the professional development in schools to affect a lasting change.

It also offers a strong argument for why the Intensive Summer Institute, and the ensuing network of teaching professionals, has proven to impact student learning.

The chart maintains that experiences affect our beliefs.  Those beliefs influence our actions which ultimately determines results.

Most professional development only acts on the top two tiers.  "Do intervention a, b, or c and you will get prescribed results."  The intervention does not 'take' because nothing has been experienced which will change beliefs. Without ongoing support for new strategies, the teacher does not have enough experience to change beliefs and falls back on old assumptions.  When the first initiative fails, a new approach is introduced.

The experience of most teachers has built the belief that "this too shall pass." We need only wait out the current reform as another one will surely replace it.

Conversely, the teachers of the Invitational Summer Institute are immersed in experiences which affect their beliefs about practice. They apply theory to practice, experience heightened engagement from learning from each other, examine student work across time and curriculum, and, most importantly in understanding how writing happens, write with an eye toward publication for a valued audience.  Over the period of a month or more, teacher create a collaborative, respectful learning environment of sharing practice, theory, and the writing life.

It is these combined experiences that teachers most often describe as 'transformational.'  The combined experience of the Institute leads teachers to the belief that their work is worthy of study, reflection, and revision--and that they can take charge of these habits of mind.

If we are to believe the model pictured in the graphic, the culture of the teaching profession must change.   Changing the experience of teachers from one of subservience to empowerment will result in classroom teachers who can enact substantive and lasting reform on a classroom by classroom basis.


Friday, July 27, 2012

Movie time: Won't back down vs the real world

I have no idea what message is being pushed in the new movie Won't Back Down starring Maggie Gyllenhaal.  But I do know that it will be oversimplified and has the potential for driving the education reform discussion in the public just as Waiting for Superman has.

Here's the trailer:

The movie is set for a September 28 release, just in time for the Back to School crowd.  

I can't tell if the target is the teachers, the system, or what.  I did see a really evil teacher in this trailer and heard a reference to the 'poverty is the problem' that critics deem an excuse by bad teachers.

Watch and judge for yourself.  Comment below.

If you are looking for movies that follow real teachers through real issues, here are a few recommendations:

American Teacher:  produced by Dave Eggers and the Teacher Salary Project.




What's it like to be a teacher in times of high stakes testing?  Watch Mitchell 20 (you can get a ticket to watch it online. Follow the Mitchell 20 hyperlink.).  This is produced by teachers, about teachers.  It must have been too close to the truth since some teachers were punished for their role in this film.




A response to the highly produced Waiting for Superman, produced by New York city teachers who have been in the classroom through the corporate reforms.  Definitely not highly produced, gritty.  What do you expect on a teacher's salary?




Tired of bashing and want some solutions?  Try these.

The Finland Phenomenon.  Imagine what school could be like if we only spent our money on what we already knows works with kids and teachers.  You can watch the whole movie here:


A short film on the vision proposed in CTQ's recently published Teaching 2030.




Saturday, July 21, 2012

Columbine, VA Tech, Aurora

Enough already.

We are a deeply troubled society. It's hard to think of us as otherwise. You know those life-changing events where you remember where you were when you heard the news?   Well, here are the ones that are vivid in my lifetime.

November 23, 1963 John F. Kennedy Assassination  (age 8)

August 1, 1966: First Shocking Mass Murder - Bell Tower Shootings at University of Texas.  ( age 11)

June 6, 1968: Robert Kennedy Assassination  (age 13)

June 10, 1968: Martin Luther King Assassination  (age 13)

January 13, 1972 Shooting of Governor George Wallace (age 16 - I recall asking my mother what was happening to us.)

November 18, 1978: Jonestown Massacre (perpetrator and all victims were Americans)

December 8, 1980:  John Lennon Shot and killed

March 30, 1981:  Ronald Reagan Shot

February, 1993: Branch Davidian Siege, Waco Texas

April 19, 1995:  Oklahoma City Bombing

April 3, 1996: Unabomber Arrested.   Associated with bombings from 1978 on.

April 20, 1999:  Columbine High School

April 16, 2007:  Virginia Tech Shootings

November 5, 2009:   Fort Hood Shootings

January 8, 2011:  Gabby Giffords Shooting in Tucson.

July 20, 2012:  Aurora, Colorado

And those are just the ones that stand out.  Sadly there are others in between.  (Shootings in a variety of schools, workplaces like offices and post offices, public venues like McDonald's or other entertainment places, the Olympics and so on.   Killings and bombings associated with abortion clinics.  But they don't rise to the level of remembering the moment.)

We need some help.

Saturday, July 7, 2012

My Summer with John Green and YA

Most teachers do not read a ton of books,* I think.

That's a terrible admission, but the truth is that the school year is so all-consuming it leaves little time for outside reading.  Still, being an English teacher means the love of reading is a pre-requisite, so a book is always on the nightstand, even if there is only time for 10 or 15 minutes before the eyes slam shut.

When I began silent sustained reading for my students more than a dozen years ago, reading for pleasure became a part of the work day (Yay!  What's not to love?) and Young Adult (YA) novels a source to be mined--but rarely a favorite.  

Raised on Madeline L'Engle and Ray Bradbury, Harry Potter was a huge letdown--no thanks.  The horror genre never appealed, zombies and love affairs with vampires seem silly.  Most YA books are wrapped around the struggle du jour: bulimia, divorce, teen pregnancy, car wrecks. Jodi Piccoult rips plots from recent sensationalist headlines and the over-the-top, cavalier behavior of her teens makes me worry, and sometimes fear, for those sitting in the classroom.

I keep a list (back of the teaching journal and in the Notes app on the phone) for books to read. I watch what the students read. (Recently finished a book that kept a reluctant reader enthralled, so I had to read it myself.)  I take recommendations.  Then, each night as I take home my assigned reading--student papers--I try to ignore the growing pile reserved for breaks.  

My Advanced Placement students and I have the same complaint: No time to read for fun.

This year, around Christmas break I cracked open my first John Green YA novel: Looking for Alaska, recommended probably four years ago. (Thanks Nicole Hackman) 

Wow.  

If writing means telling the truth, John Green gets it right.  In spite of schoolwork, I sped on to his current best-seller The Fault in Our Stars --number one on the New York Times bestseller list for seven consecutive weeks--devouring it in two days.  

I left these in the front of the room to convince students to "Just try this one. You'll love it."  (Talking with students about shared books is a career highlight.)

Since then, I set aside his other books, Paper Towns and An Abundance of Katherinesto read for the summer.  Both were just completed in the "I can't wait to get back to my book" frame of mind.

What's to love about a John Green novel?  Lots.  

The characters in his book seem real to me, reflecting the majority of teens I work with everyday. They are funny, a bit nerdy, and on the cusp of adulthood, always in that nether-space between home and the rest of the world.  They work through everyday problems with wit, the kind of wit that makes figuring out how to be human a bit cool, even for nerds.  

His pacing is excellent -- some unresolved issue drags us clear to the end--an end that does NOT culminate in the perfect prom date, though milestone events are not ignored. Every book makes me laugh out loud.  The first two had me crying, for real. 

Other things to love:  Green's characters have everyday lives--the kind of life a real American teen lives everyday.  They have homework to do.  Classes take up the majority of their time, stretching a developing problem into weeks.  Cars break down, get wrecked, or don't exist.  There is a fair amount of drinking--and drunkenness--and swearing.  And there is some lying to authority figures, sneaking around, acknowledgment of painful screw-ups, and self-centered observations.  But events are not shrugged off.  The characters think about how choices turn out.   

One favorite aspect of the books is the relationship between the protagonist and the parents. (There is always a mom and a dad--who must be telephoned to account for whereabouts etc.).  Their presence is a loving one, coupled with the usual misunderstandings between generations and a fair amount of eye-rolling observations by the kid. Though not a central feature, the parents are a constant, tangential background noise, just like real life.

Finally, there is hope and love between the central group of friends, expressed in the way teens love each other: punching, inside jokes, nicknames.  Still, they also have major complaints about each other, even fights.  I'm only guessing, but I think most teens would find their inner lives acknowledged in print.  These kids represent the vast majority of kids that go unnoticed: regular kids growing up.

After reading all four books (everyone an award winner of some sort), I think Green may have run through his store of coming-of-age books.  But these are YA novels that manage to draw an adult back into this painful but rich time of life to remember with clarity how much was learned from all the screw ups, fights, lies, and revelations.  That's a real gift.  

If it's been a long time since you thought about those years, try one of these.  It's a good reminder for all of us that being an adolescent is a really important time of life.



*Just to compare, my daughter, a veterinarian has lots of time for reading--no homework, downtime between patients.  My gastro doc also shares his current reads with me.  I suffer pangs of envy during these conversations and do not admit that I have not kept up with my reading.  Irony alert: English teachers amongst them all probably have the least amount of time for reading.